Home / Editorial / Why do countries have weird gambling laws?

Why do countries have weird gambling laws?

You’ve probably encountered more than enough weird gambling laws in various countries, especially ones that used to be British colonies in the past. Most of the countries that are former members of the British commonwealth share relatively same standpoints towards gambling operations. In essence, they allow them to exist, but to a certain degree.

One of the weirdest aspects that you may have seen in a country’s gambling regulation is that online operators cannot offer their services to the local population. This fact has been mind-boggling for economist in the past, present and will continue to be hard to understand well in the future.

So why do countries like Australia, Canada, UK, and New Zealand carry these laws? What do they accomplish?

What the law looks like

In the countries listed above, gambling operations offline are completely legal and every company has the right to cater to the local population, but if that very same company wants to take their operations online, then they will be forced to find their clientele elsewhere, despite the fact that the demand is still there.

Most governments would justify this law by saying that it’s implemented to protect the offline casinos located within the country’s jurisdiction. According to https://play.casino/,  in most cases, the companies trying to open online casinos, are the offline casinos themselves, they’re simply trying to diversify their offerings and the local law prohibits them. And if they make an attempt of launching it and offering services to the local clientele, they’ll be put in the country’s blacklist.

The biggest contradiction though is found in the way the law deals with foreign online operators. Many would think that if local companies can’t offer local clients their services, then foreigners should definitely not have that option as well, right? Well, no.

In the countries listed above, only foreign companies have the right to offer online gambling services to the specific country’s population.

This is why so many economists have been debating this issue. If the offline casinos are still not protected from online competitors, then why not simply allow them to feature those online platforms? It would generate much more revenue for them, and add it to the country’s budget through taxes.

Nevertheless, that’s how the Commonwealth countries like to enforce their regulation, and the consumers are completely fine with it.

Follow us on

Check Also

Swedish regulator clears four operators of underage betting allegations

Spelinspektionen, the Swedish gambling regulator, has cleared four operators from any wrongdoings following an investigation …

Google continues to relax gambling advertising stance

Google has updated its gambling and games policy, authorizing advertising for sports betting services in …


  1. If we say we talk of human rights then let the law be reconsider again

  2. Very nice post thanks you

  3. nice post my bros

  4. Chukwuka Ekwenze

    I am interested for that

  5. I supposed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons